These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

274 related items for PubMed ID: 18070224

  • 21. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of the temporal hemifield and nasal hemifield sensitivity in patients with early-onset convergent strabismus.
    Polati M, Malta RF, Alves CA.
    Strabismus; 2007 Jun; 15(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 18058354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Rarebit perimetry in normal subjects: test-retest variability, learning effect, normative range, influence of optical defocus, and cataract extraction.
    Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L, Brusini P.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 48(11):5320-31. PubMed ID: 17962489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers.
    Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Sep; 30(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 2777523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
    Janknecht P, Soriano JM, Funk J, Hansen LL.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Sensitivity in the nasal and temporal hemifields in children treated for cataract.
    Bowering ER, Maurer D, Lewis TL, Brent HP.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Dec; 34(13):3501-9. PubMed ID: 8258506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The robustness of various forms of perimetry to different levels of induced intraocular stray light.
    Anderson RS, Redmond T, McDowell DR, Breslin KM, Zlatkova MB.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):4022-8. PubMed ID: 19407020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination.
    Kotecha A, O'Leary N, Melmoth D, Grant S, Crabb DP.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 18806294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH, Funk J.
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
    Shah VA, Chalam KV.
    Ophthalmic Res; 2009 Apr; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Points of a normal visual field are not statistically independent.
    Lachenmayr BJ, Kiermeir U, Kojetinsky S.
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 May; 4(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7663331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Threshold-adjusted supraliminal pattern perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
    Fischer FW.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 185(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 6492677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Fatigue effect within 10 degrees visual field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E.
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 25(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 8484656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [A new strategy for automated static perimetry].
    Weber J.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990 Apr; 87(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2323694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The working threshold approach to Friedmann visual field analyser screening.
    Gutteridge IF.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983 Apr; 3(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 6866521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Glass E, Schaumberger M, Lachenmayr BJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 7635658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.