These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
200 related items for PubMed ID: 18078886
1. Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Soohoo NF, Vyas RM, Samimi DB, Molina R, Lieberman JR. J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1168-73. PubMed ID: 18078886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G. Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Sep; 60(9):834-40. PubMed ID: 11502609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Azkárate J, Güenaga JI. Clin Rheumatol; 2002 Nov; 21(6):466-71. PubMed ID: 12447629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement. Nilsdotter AK, Roos EM, Westerlund JP, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. Arthritis Rheum; 2001 Jun; 45(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 11409667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Baron G, Tubach F, Ravaud P, Logeart I, Dougados M. Arthritis Rheum; 2007 May 15; 57(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 17471534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Condition-specific Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index was not superior to region-specific Lower Extremity Functional Scale at detecting change. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Hanna SE. J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Oct 15; 57(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 15528053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is postoperative function after hip or knee arthroplasty influenced by preoperative functional levels? Lavernia C, D'Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D. J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct 15; 24(7):1033-43. PubMed ID: 18963759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pain, physical functioning and quality of life of individuals awaiting total joint replacement: a longitudinal study. McHugh GA, Luker KA, Campbell M, Kay PR, Silman AJ. J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Feb 15; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18211639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Do pain referral patterns determine patient outcome after total hip arthroplasty? Street J, Lenehan B, Flavin R, Beale E, Murray P. Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Oct 15; 71(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 16305078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Discriminant validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index physical functioning subscale in community samples with hip osteoarthritis. Pua YH, Cowan SM, Wrigley TV, Bennell KL. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Oct 15; 90(10):1772-7. PubMed ID: 19801070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Chambers GK, Jagpal TJ, Masri BA, Duncan CP. J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jan 15; 16(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 11172276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Arostegui I, Bilbao A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, Arenaza JC. Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan 23; 166(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 16432092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Kirschner S, Walther M, Böhm D, Matzer M, Heesen T, Faller H, König A. Rheumatol Int; 2003 Jan 23; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12548437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of pre-operative physiotherapy in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty. Ferrara PE, Rabini A, Maggi L, Piazzini DB, Logroscino G, Magliocchetti G, Amabile E, Tancredi G, Aulisa AG, Padua L, Aprile I, Bertolini C. Clin Rehabil; 2008 Jan 23; 22(10-11):977-86. PubMed ID: 18955429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score. Garbuz DS, Xu M, Sayre EC. J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct 23; 21(7):998-1004. PubMed ID: 17027542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Söderman P, Malchau H. Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Feb 23; 71(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10743991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Dec 23; 13(12):1076-83. PubMed ID: 16154777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Does parallel item content on WOMAC's pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2004 Jun 09; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15189563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The impact of preoperative function and pain on early patient-centred outcome after total hip arthroplasty]. Kessler S, Mattes T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Käfer W. Z Orthop Unfall; 2007 Jun 09; 145(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 17939064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical results 2 years after total hip replacement (WOMAC/SF-36) and comparison with the normal population (SF-36)]. Huber JF, Satkauskas I, Theiler R, Zumstein M, Ruflin GB. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006 Jun 09; 144(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 16821181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]