These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


437 related items for PubMed ID: 18093261

  • 1. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.
    Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18093261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN.
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Feb; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T, Tawara A.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I, Patsea E, Chatzimichali K, Skouriotis S, Chalkidou S, Amariotakis G, Papakonstadinou D, Theodossiadis G, Amariotakis A, Georgopoulos G.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Chou CY, Jordan CA, McGhee CN, Patel DV.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC, Liu CJ, Hsu WM.
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC, Mucke S, Osuagwu UL.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.