These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

89 related items for PubMed ID: 18098181

  • 1. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems.
    Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M, van Guens RJ, Boersma E, Serruys PW, van der Giessen WJ.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan 01; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18098181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advances in two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: improved small lumen diameter detection and automatic reference vessel diameter derivation.
    Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Onuma Y, Aben JP, Weijers B, Morel MA, Wentzel JJ, Serruys PW.
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Mar 01; 7(11):1326-35. PubMed ID: 22433196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I, Dato I, Todaro D, Calabrese M, Rigattieri S, Leone AM, Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Trani C, Crea F.
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun 01; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vitro validation and comparison of different software packages or algorithms for coronary bifurcation analysis using calibrated phantoms: implications for clinical practice and research of bifurcation stenting.
    Ishibashi Y, Grundeken MJ, Nakatani S, Iqbal J, Morel MA, Généreux P, Girasis C, Wentzel JJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Serruys PW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar 01; 85(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25059819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Maeng M, Reiber JH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug 01; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T, Grundeken MJ, Ishibashi Y, Nakatani S, Girasis C, Campos CM, Morel MA, Jonker H, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, García-García HM, Leon MB, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, TRYTON Pivotal IDE Coronary Bifurcation Trial Investigators.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep 01; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries.
    Haase J, Di Mario C, Slager CJ, van der Giessen WJ, den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Reiber JH, Verdouw PD, Serruys PW.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep 01; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
    Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, Montauban van Swijndregt E, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, di Mario C, Kirkeeide R, Serruys PW.
    Circulation; 1995 Apr 15; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessing intermediate coronary lesions: angiographic prediction of lesion severity on intravascular ultrasound.
    Fernandes MR, Silva GV, Caixeta A, Rati M, de Sousa e Silva NA, Perin EC.
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Oct 15; 19(10):412-6. PubMed ID: 17906342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA, Tu S, Barbato E, Barbati G, Di Serafino L, De Vroey F, Toth G, Mangiacapra F, Sinagra G, De Bruyne B, Reiber JH, Wijns W.
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec 15; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.