These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Accuracy of noninvasive coronary stenosis quantification of different commercially available dedicated software packages. Dikkers R, Willems TP, de Jonge GJ, Marquering HA, Greuter MJ, van Ooijen PM, van der Weide MC, Oudkerk M. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Feb; 33(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 19638840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. Di Mario C, Haase J, den Boer A, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods. Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K, Barlis P, Tanigawa J, Vatankulu MA, Koning G, Tuinenburg JC, Mario CD. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Feb 01; 69(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 17191235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions. Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, Pomerantsev E, Nieman K, Moselewski F, Abbara S, Jang IK, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U. Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar 15; 57(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16442256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: novel 3-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis. Dvir D, Assali A, Kornowski R. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May 01; 71(6):784-9. PubMed ID: 18415954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]