These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 18159624

  • 1. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Nordholm S.
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Gartner EC.
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Poppema ST.
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Pevsner WJ.
    MedGenMed; 2007 Aug 22; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18092047
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA, Yanow S.
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May 22; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B.
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun 06; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion.
    Greene MF.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996 May 24; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The partial death of abortion rights.
    Charo RA.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The argument that never ends.
    Simon R.
    US News World Rep; 2003 Jan 20; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
    Walsh KP.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec 20; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar 20; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH.
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997 May 24; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar 24; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA.
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 Mar 24; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB, Gostin LO.
    JAMA; 2019 Jul 02; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996 Jul 02; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER.
    Am J Law Med; 1989 Jul 02; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
    Drenning MG.
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar 02; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.