These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

695 related items for PubMed ID: 18165400

  • 1. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol.
    Colón I, Clawson K, Hunter K, Druzin ML, Taslimi MM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):747-52. PubMed ID: 15746667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L, Peden H, Tomlinson AJ, Al-Hussaini TK, Idama T, Candelier C, Luckas M, Furniss H, Davies A, Kumar B, Roberts J, Alfirevic Z.
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women.
    Cheng SY, Hsue CS, Hwang GH, Chen W, Li TC.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20178530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R, Getgan M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
    Cheng SY, Chen TC.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Guberman C, Tran S, Parrish A, Guinn D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Fisher SA, Mackenzie VP, Davies GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 11641676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Savage K, Lincoln T, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W, Dudenhausen JW, Hanel C, Chen FC.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K, Powers B, Robertson S, Alfirevic Z.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA, Alsibiani S, Mansouri N, Alsinani N, Darhouse K.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Castañeda CS, Izquierdo Puente JC, Leon Ochoa RA, Plasse TF, Powers BL, Rayburn WF.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.