These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Comparative performance of Colisure (TM) and accepted methods in the detection of chlorine-injured total coliforms and E.coli. McFeters GA, Broadaway SC, Pyle BH, Pickett M, Egozy Y. Water Sci Technol; 1995; 31(5-6):259-61. PubMed ID: 11539133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates--a promising tool in microbiology. Manafi M, Kneifel W. Acta Microbiol Hung; 1991; 38(3-4):293-304. PubMed ID: 1817426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple and cost-effective method for the quantification of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in potable water. Yáñez MA, Valor C, Catalán V. J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jun; 65(3):608-11. PubMed ID: 16202463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid identification of Escherichia coli from urine by using Fluorocult media. Mori T, Takahashi H, Maehata E, Naka H. Acta Microbiol Hung; 1991 Jun; 38(3-4):273-81. PubMed ID: 1817424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water. Pitkänen T, Paakkari P, Miettinen IT, Heinonen-Tanski H, Paulin L, Hänninen ML. J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative determination of Escherichia coli from coliforms and faecal coliforms in sea water. Mates A, Schaffer M. Microbios; 1992 Mar; 71(286):27-32. PubMed ID: 1406342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance]. Havemeister G, Aleksic S, Bockemühl J, Heinemeyer EA, Müller HE, Von Pritzbuer E. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of TEMPO EC and TBX medium for the enumeration of Escherichia coli in cheese. Torlak E, Akan IM, Gökmen M. Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 47(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 19120927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Presence of fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli and DNAse- and coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus, in "colonial" cheese sold in the city of Blumenau, Estado de Santa Catarina, Brazil]. Reibnitz MG, Tavares LB, García JA. Rev Argent Microbiol; 1998 Dec; 30(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 9629602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The presence of Enterococcus, coliforms and E. coli in a commercial yeast manufacturing process. O'Brien SS, Lindsay D, von Holy A. Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Jul 01; 94(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 15172482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Foodborne pathogens and microbiological characteristics of raw milk soft cheese produced and on retail sale in Brazil. Moraes PM, Viçosa GN, Yamazi AK, Ortolani MB, Nero LA. Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Mar 01; 6(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 19099356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts. Augustin JC, Carlier V. Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb 01; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Enumeration of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and Escherichia coli in foods by hydrophobic grid membrane filter: supplementary report. Entis P. J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1984 Feb 01; 67(4):811-2. PubMed ID: 6381469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]