These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 18194056
1. An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. Pacton S, Perruchet P. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 18194056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is an attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning valid? Pacton S, Sobaco A, Perruchet P. Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():195-9. PubMed ID: 25819598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition. Leder H, Carbon CC. Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time? Oberauer K, Bialkova S. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention. Lachnit H, Schultheis H, König S, Ungör M, Melchers K. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds. Fazl A, Grossberg S, Mingolla E. Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape. Alexander T, Wilson SP, Wilson PN. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis. Old SR, Naveh-Benjamin M. Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 18361660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults. Minda JP, Desroches AS, Church BA. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory. Griffiths O, Mitchell CJ. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments. Matute H, Vegas S, De Marez PJ. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 12109763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Priming of simple and complex scene layout: rapid function from the intermediate level. Sanocki T, Sulman N. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):735-49. PubMed ID: 19485688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes. Melchers KG, Shanks DR, Lachnit H. Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):413-27; discussion 451-3. PubMed ID: 18031954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Configural and elemental processing in associative learning: commentary on Melchers, Shanks and Lachnit. Wagner AR, Vogel EH. Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 18164142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. Knoblich G, Jordan JS. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):1006-16. PubMed ID: 14516231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink. Livesey EJ, Harris IM, Harris JA. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. Cheung OS, Richler JJ, Palmeri TJ, Gauthier I. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1327-36. PubMed ID: 19045978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Kushnir T, Gopnik A. Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17201518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The direction of hemispheric asymmetries for object categorization at different levels of abstraction depends on the task. Studer T, Hübner R. Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 18308442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning nonadjacent dependencies: no need for algebraic-like computations. Perruchet P, Tyler MD, Galland N, Peereman R. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):573-83. PubMed ID: 15584807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]