These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

549 related items for PubMed ID: 18200632

  • 1. Influence of varying electroosmotic flow on the effective diffusion in electric field gradient separations.
    Maynes D, Tenny J, Webbd BW, Lee ML.
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Feb; 29(3):549-60. PubMed ID: 18200632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Numerical calculation of the electroosmotic flow at the cross region in microfluidic chips.
    Jin Y, Luo GA.
    Electrophoresis; 2003 Apr; 24(7-8):1242-52. PubMed ID: 12707918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Numerical analysis of field-modulated electroosmotic flows in microchannels with arbitrary numbers and configurations of discrete electrodes.
    Chao K, Chen B, Wu J.
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Dec; 12(6):959-66. PubMed ID: 20668948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diffusion as major source of band broadening in field-amplified sample stacking under negligible electroosmotic flow velocity conditions.
    Huhn C, Pyell U.
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 Jun 25; 1217(26):4476-86. PubMed ID: 20452606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Modeling of electroosmotic and electrophoretic mobilization in capillary and microchip isoelectric focusing.
    Thormann W, Caslavska J, Mosher RA.
    J Chromatogr A; 2007 Jul 06; 1155(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 17307189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Programed elution and peak profiles in electric field gradient focusing.
    Lin SL, Li Y, Woolley AT, Lee ML, Tolley HD, Warnick KF.
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Mar 06; 29(5):1058-66. PubMed ID: 18246576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency bandwidth limitation of external pulse electric fields in cylindrical micro-channel electrophoresis with analyte velocity modulation.
    Wang SC, Chen HP, Lee CY, Yeo LY.
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Apr 15; 20(10):2131-5. PubMed ID: 15741086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Optimizing band width and resolution in micro-free flow electrophoresis.
    Fonslow BR, Bowser MT.
    Anal Chem; 2006 Dec 15; 78(24):8236-44. PubMed ID: 17165812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Electroosmotic Flow (EOF).
    Slater GW, Tessier F, Kopecka K.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010 Dec 15; 583():121-34. PubMed ID: 19763462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Field-effect flow control in a polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic system.
    Buch JS, Wang PC, DeVoe DL, Lee CS.
    Electrophoresis; 2001 Oct 15; 22(18):3902-7. PubMed ID: 11700719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Low-voltage driven control in electrophoresis microchips by traveling electric field.
    Fu LM, Yang RJ.
    Electrophoresis; 2003 Apr 15; 24(7-8):1253-60. PubMed ID: 12707919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.