These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 18209282

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA, Pillai SD, Mott JB, Vargas M, Dean KE, Di Giovanni GD.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
    Harwood VJ, Wiggins B, Hagedorn C, Ellender RD, Gooch J, Kern J, Samadpour M, Chapman AC, Robinson BJ, Thompson BC.
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Novel application of a statistical technique, Random Forests, in a bacterial source tracking study.
    Smith A, Sterba-Boatwright B, Mott J.
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(14):4067-76. PubMed ID: 20566209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
    Hassan WM, Ellender RD, Wang SY.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC, Chu W, Olson BH, He JW, Choi S, Zhang J, Le JY, Gedalanga PB.
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling.
    Duran M, Yurtsever D, Dunaev T.
    Water Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spatial and temporal variability of ribotyping results at a small watershed in South Carolina.
    Kelsey RH, Webster LF, Kenny DJ, Stewart JR, Scott GI.
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2220-8. PubMed ID: 18206209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimization and validation of rep-PCR genotypic libraries for microbial source tracking of environmental Escherichia coli isolates.
    Lyautey E, Lu Z, Lapen DR, Berkers TE, Edge TA, Topp E.
    Can J Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 56(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 20130688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sourcing faecal pollution from onsite wastewater treatment systems in surface waters using antibiotic resistance analysis.
    Carroll S, Hargreaves M, Goonetilleke A.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005 Jan; 99(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 16108788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in a dairy farm.
    Son I, Van Kessel JA, Karns JS.
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Sep; 6(7):837-47. PubMed ID: 19459756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.