These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
299 related items for PubMed ID: 18210314
1. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis. Schlosser T, Scheuermann T, Ulzheimer S, Mohrs OK, Kühling M, Albrecht PE, Voigtländer T, Barkhausen J, Schmermund A. Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner. Schlosser T, Scheuermann T, Ulzheimer S, Mohrs OK, Kühling M, Albrecht PE, Voigtländer T, Barkhausen J, Schmermund A. Clin Res Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 96(12):883-90. PubMed ID: 17694381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of in-stent restenosis of coronary stents using 40-detector row computed tomography in vitro. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kuwahara S, Kaminaga T, Takei R, Isshiki T, Kozuma K, Aizawa T. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 Dec; 32(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 18379312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners? Wolf F, Feuchtner GM, Homolka P, Langenberger H, Stadler A, Bader TR, Weber M, Lammer J, Loewe C. Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Herzog C, Stahl J, Stanzel S, Kuettner A, Wildberger JE, Günther RW. Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 15597014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new high-definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT. Tanami Y, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Imai Y, Segawa K, Kuribayashi S. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 28(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 21222034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of coronary artery bifurcation angles by multidetector computed tomography. Pflederer T, Ludwig J, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S. Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 17035869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S, Pesenti-Rossi D, Daoud B, Habis M, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Perrier E, Angel CY, Lancelin B, Paul JF. Am J Cardiol; 2006 Oct 01; 98(7):871-6. PubMed ID: 16996865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of 40-detector row computed tomography before catheter coronary angiography to select early conservative versus early invasive treatment for patients with low-risk acute coronary syndrome. Tsai IC, Lee T, Lee WL, Tsao CR, Tsai WL, Chen MC, Ting CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007 Oct 01; 31(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 17414764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]