These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
309 related items for PubMed ID: 18221962
21. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency. Patel MI, Spernat D, Lopez-Corona E. J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21575963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Pharmacoangiographic evidence of the presence and anatomical dominance of accessory pudendal artery(s). Nehra A, Kumar R, Ramakumar S, Myers RP, Blute ML, McKusick MA. J Urol; 2008 Jun; 179(6):2317-20. PubMed ID: 18423744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New insights into the pathogenesis of penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and the role of postoperative sexual function. Gontero P, Galzerano M, Bartoletti R, Magnani C, Tizzani A, Frea B, Mondaini N. J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):602-7. PubMed ID: 17570431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation. Rabbani F, Patel M, Cozzi P, Mulhall JP, Scardino PT. BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19338540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Labanaris AP, Zugor V, Takriti S, Smiszek R, Engelhard K, Nutzel R, Kuhn R. Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009 Nov; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving cancer control and recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: nerve sparing versus nerve resection with grafting. Cozzi P. ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):834-5. PubMed ID: 18959630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing. Finley DS, Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1484-9. PubMed ID: 19388985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. Rodriguez E, Melamud O, Ahlering TE. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy? Marien TP, Lepor H. BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The failure of a nerve sparing template to improve urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: attention to study design. Tzou DT, Dalkin BL, Christopher BA, Cui H. Urol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 18439849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Cavernous nerve reconstruction to restore erectile function following radical prostatectomy]. Song LJ, Pan LJ, Xu YM. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Oct; 12(10):939-42. PubMed ID: 17121030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]