These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

843 related items for PubMed ID: 18227299

  • 1. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure.
    Bercker S, Schmidbauer W, Volk T, Bogusch G, Bubser HP, Hensel M, Kerner T.
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Feb; 106(2):445-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18227299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices.
    Thee C, Serocki G, Doerges V, Ilies C, Wallenius K, Bein B, Steinfath M, Cavus E.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 May; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 20216069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model.
    Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T.
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Jan; 102(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 19011262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A.
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparison of the Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Proseal laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized patients].
    Ueno M, Suzuki A, Takahata O, Iwasaki H.
    Masui; 2008 Sep; 57(9):1131-5. PubMed ID: 18807900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Improved esophageal patency when inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with an Eschmann tracheal tube introducer.
    El Beheiry H, Wong J, Nair G, Chinnappa V, Arora G, Morales E, Chung F.
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 56(10):725-32. PubMed ID: 19603240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices.
    Ulrich-Pur H, Hrska F, Krafft P, Friehs H, Wulkersdorfer B, Köstler WJ, Rabitsch W, Staudinger T, Schuster E, Frass M.
    Anesthesiology; 2006 May; 104(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 16645443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals.
    Cavus E, Deitmer W, Francksen H, Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Doerges V.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures.
    Zand F, Amini A, Sadeghi SE, Gureishi M, Chohedri A.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 17608965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
    Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K.
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Sudhir G, Redfern D, Hall JE, Wilkes AR, Cann C.
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of different laryngeal mask airways in a resuscitation model].
    Genzwürker H, Hundt A, Finteis T, Ellinger K.
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Feb; 38(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12557121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of the Soft Seal disposable and the Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway.
    Shafik MT, Bahlman BU, Hall JE, Ali MS.
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Feb; 61(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 16430570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The cuff of the new single use intubating laryngeal mask endotracheal tube has low-pressure characteristics.
    Péan D, Léturgie C, Lejus C.
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Jul; 105(1):293-4. PubMed ID: 17579007
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients].
    Braun U, Zerbst M, Füllekrug B, Gentzel I, Hempel V, Leier M, Peters T, Hobbensiefken G, Klein U, Heuser D, Weyland A, Rey D, Weirich C, Krier C.
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2002 Dec; 37(12):727-33. PubMed ID: 12469285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices--a manikin study.
    Ruetzler K, Roessler B, Potura L, Priemayr A, Robak O, Schuster E, Frass M.
    Resuscitation; 2011 May; 82(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 21353364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.