These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


97 related items for PubMed ID: 1822985

  • 1. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.
    Brencher HL, Kohl P, Reinke AR, Yolton RL.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 1822985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
    Lawson-Kopp W, DeJong A, Yudcovitch L, Williams S, Kohl P, Yolton RL.
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
    Pearce CD, Kohl P, Yolton RL.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW, Jay JL, Ackerley R, Walsh G.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M, Hoffmann OF.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. XPERT NCT--a clinical evaluation.
    Myers KJ, Lalle P, Litwak A, Campbell S, Ballinger R, Grolman B.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Nov; 61(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 2081831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Popovich KS, Shields MB.
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Feb; 6(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 9075080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ, Evans NM, Fielder AR.
    Eye (Lond); 1989 Feb; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Yücel AA, Stürmer J, Gloor B.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
    Patikulsila D, Taweemankongsab S, Ngamtipakorn S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
    Sandhu SS, Chattopadhyay S, Amariotakis GA, Skarmoutsos F, Birch MK, Ray-Chaudhuri N.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers.
    Wingert TA, Bassi CJ, McAlister WH, Galanis JC.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 8576531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC, Almubrad TM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T, Landenberger H.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC, Liu CJ, Hsu WM.
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW, Yevelenko V, Hoy L, Meyer A, Erb C.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*.
    van der Jagt LH, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ, Thompson JR, Deutsch J, Misson GP, Naylor G, Tan-Yee A, Taylor RH, Fielder AR.
    Eye (Lond); 1993 Sep; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
    Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.