These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

751 related items for PubMed ID: 18231883

  • 1. Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of caesarean due to dystocia in low risk pregnancies.
    Roman H, Goffinet F, Hulsey TF, Newman R, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 18231883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Non-elective caesarean delivery due to ineffective uterine contractility or due to obstructed labour in relation to maternal body mass index.
    Cedergren MI.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Aug; 145(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 19525054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries.
    Barau G, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC, Dedecker F, Laffite A, Gérardin P, Kauffmann E.
    BJOG; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1173-7. PubMed ID: 16972860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F, Perisa M, Stojnić E.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996 Oct; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Do risk factors for elective cesarean section differ from those of cesarean section during labor in low risk pregnancies?
    Roman H, Blondel B, Bréart G, Goffinet F.
    J Perinat Med; 2008 Oct; 36(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 18598118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between pregnancies and risk of primary cesarean delivery.
    Getahun D, Kaminsky LM, Elsasser DA, Kirby RS, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 197(4):376.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17904966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Labour dystocia--risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour--a population-based cohort study.
    Sandström A, Cnattingius S, Wikström AK, Stephansson O.
    BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1648-56. PubMed ID: 23078516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A prospective study on some factors which influence the delivery of large babies.
    Lawoyin TO.
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1993 Dec; 96(6):352-6. PubMed ID: 8254713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ, ALSPAC Study Team.
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour.
    Sherrard A, Platt RW, Vallerand D, Usher RH, Zhang X, Kramer MS.
    BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1088-96. PubMed ID: 17617199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Trends in maternal obesity and associated risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a population of Chinese women.
    Leung TY, Leung TN, Sahota DS, Chan OK, Chan LW, Fung TY, Lau TK.
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1529-37. PubMed ID: 19035989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between the first and second pregnancies and risk of large-for-gestational-age birth.
    Getahun D, Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Salihu HM, Scorza WE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):530.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17547882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J, van der Does CD.
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995 Jun; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Maternal and perinatal outcome in obese pregnant patients.
    Schrauwers C, Dekker G.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Mar; 22(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 19330705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fetal macrosomia in African women: a study of 249 cases.
    Kamanu CI, Onwere S, Chigbu B, Aluka C, Okoro O, Obasi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):857-61. PubMed ID: 19018549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prediction of dystocia-related cesarean section risk in uncomplicated Taiwanese nulliparas at term.
    Wu CH, Chen CF, Chien CC.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1027-33. PubMed ID: 23636412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Birth complications, overweight, and physical inactivity.
    Voldner N, Frøslie KF, Haakstad LA, Bø K, Henriksen T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009 Nov; 88(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 19277916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Infertility treatment is an independent risk factor for cesarean section among nulliparous women aged 40 and above.
    Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hershkovitz R, Katz M, Mazor M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):888-92. PubMed ID: 11641672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy.
    Yang Q, Wen SW, Oppenheimer L, Chen XK, Black D, Gao J, Walker MC.
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 17355267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden.
    Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, Cnattingius S.
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 17877673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.