These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 18236930

  • 1. Interface dimensions of CEREC-3 MOD onlays.
    Wang WC, McDonald A, Petrie A, Setchell D.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Dec; 15(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 18236930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
    Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T, Schneider D.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Nov; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the marginal seal of CEREC 3D restorations using two different luting agents.
    Jahangiri L, Agosta C, Estafan D.
    Gen Dent; 2007 Nov; 55(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 17333982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T, De Nisco S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Nov; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
    da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Nov; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W, Miranda WG, Cesar PF, Braga RR.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Nov; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system.
    Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D.
    Gen Dent; 2004 Nov; 52(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 15206254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D, Dussetschleger F, Agosta C, Reich S.
    Gen Dent; 2003 Nov; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype.
    Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Aug; 33(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 19051857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays.
    Posselt A, Kerschbaum T.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14601187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Ceramic inlays and onlays: update 1995.
    Nasedkin JN.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Aug; 61(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 7553399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays.
    Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM.
    Dent Mater; 2000 Jan; 16(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 11203526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NR, Att W, Strub JR.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Preparations for Cerec inlays, onlays, and partial crowns.
    Hansen S.
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Oct; 2(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 11373734
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
    Luthardt RG, Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Walter MH, Hüls A.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Oct; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of the Fabrication Technique on the Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Ceramic Onlays.
    Neto CF, Santos GC, Santos M.
    Oper Dent; 2020 Oct; 45(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 31373887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance.
    Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The use of modern ceramics for inlays and onlays].
    Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H, Manhartsberger C.
    Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 2700408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.