These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

498 related items for PubMed ID: 18247906

  • 1. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS, Throckmorton CS, Collins LM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L, Rosenhouse J, Podoshin L, Rosenhouse G, Zanutto SB.
    Med Prog Technol; 1994 Dec; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK.
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989 Jun; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.
    Baumann U, Nobbe A.
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
    Simpson A, McDermott HJ, Dowell RC, Sucher C, Briggs RJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi JS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
    Clark GM, Blamey PJ, Brown AM, Gusby PA, Dowell RC, Franz BK, Pyman BC, Shepherd RK, Tong YC, Webb RL.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987 Sep; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978 Sep; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Niewiarowicz M, Stieler O.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005 Sep; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.