These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1054 related items for PubMed ID: 18247912

  • 1. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K, Jongman A, Wade T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A, Amano-Kusumoto A, Hosom JP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL, Uchanski RM, Braida LD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives.
    Maniwa K, Jongman A, Wade T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3962-73. PubMed ID: 19507978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D, Bazo D.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D, Burkle TZ, Lee JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS, Younger MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW, Beltyukova SA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS, Lyzenga J, Dreschler WA, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Syllabic compression and speech intelligibility in hearing impaired listeners.
    Verschuure J, Dreschler WA, de Haan EH, van Cappellen M, Hammerschlag R, Maré MJ, Maas AJ, Hijmans AC.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Mar; 38():92-100. PubMed ID: 8153570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
    Başkent D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH, Kewley-Port D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An across-frequency processing deficit in listeners with hearing impairment is supported by acoustic correlation.
    Healy EW, Kannabiran A, Bacon SP.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 16411807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 53.