These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
415 related items for PubMed ID: 18248114
1. Task constraints mask great apes' ability to solve the trap-table task. Girndt A, Meier T, Call J. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 18248114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Mulcahy NJ, Call J. Anim Cogn; 2006 Jul; 9(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 16612632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracking the displacement of objects: a series of tasks with great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) and young children (Homo sapiens). Barth J, Call J. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 16834492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios. Uher J, Call J. J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 18489236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Piagetian liquid conservation in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, and Pongo pygmaeus). Suda C, Call J. J Comp Psychol; 2004 Sep; 118(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 15482054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility. Vlamings PH, Uher J, Call J. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jan; 32(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 16435965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gravity and solidity in four great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus): vertical and horizontal variations of the table task. Cacchione T, Call J, Zingg R. J Comp Psychol; 2009 May; 123(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 19450024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus). Call J. J Comp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 118(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 15250810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality. Albiach-Serrano A, Bugnyar T, Call J. J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 22545765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Great apes select tools on the basis of their rigidity. Manrique HM, Gross AN, Call J. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 20718558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. Mulcahy NJ, Call J. J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19685972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Great apes' capacities to recognize relational similarity. Haun DB, Call J. Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 19111286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species. Call J. Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 16924458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]