These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1498 related items for PubMed ID: 18262011

  • 1. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Feb; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T, Svediene O, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Jun; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 75.