These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1073 related items for PubMed ID: 18262011

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T, Svediene O, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Apr; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Apr; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Apr; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Amaral AL, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Apr; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Apr; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Compagnoni MA, Molo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Apr; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Apr; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 54.