These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

3834 related items for PubMed ID: 18262014

  • 1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, LongXing N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N, Aykent F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C, Saraçoglu A, Cötert HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I, Ergun G, Uctasli S, Lassila LV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD, Das UK.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Aug; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Aug; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P.
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 192.