These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Sundgren PC, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson EM. Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, Hellmich M, Nijenhuis M, Lackner K, Gossmann A. Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Enhanced MR-angiography (CE-MRA) of the supraaortic arteries: dose reduction with a contrast agent of high relaxivity (Gd-BOPTA)]. Friese S, Klose U, Kastrup A, Krapf H, Küker W. Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1363-7. PubMed ID: 14556105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Kirchin MA, Scotti G. Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):559-67. PubMed ID: 18648255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery. Scarabino T, Fossaceca R, Carra L, Florio F, Marano G, Carriero A. Radiol Med; 2003 Aug; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA. Zhang J, Ding S, Zhao H, Sun B, Li X, Zhou Y, Wan J, Degnan AJ, Xu J, Zhu C. Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography. Jackson MR, Chang AS, Robles HA, Gillespie DL, Olsen SB, Kaiser WJ, Goff JM, O'Donnell SD, Rich NM. Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study. Nonent M, Ben Salem D, Serfaty JM, Buthion V, Pasco-Papon A, Rotaru C, Bressollette L, Papon X, Pachai C, Fortrat JO, Gouny P, Badra A, Berge J, Le Bras Y, Cottier JP, Gauvrit JY, Douek P. J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries]. Carriero A, Gatta S, Baratto M, Marano R, Aulisa R, Bonomo L. Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 9638159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study. Kittner T, Rudolf J, Fages JF, Legmann P, Aschauer M, Repa I, Alvares MR, Savalegui I, Ittrich H, Geterud K, de Kevviler E, Ayuso J, Lockhart ME, Blum A, Iliasch H, Leisinger G, van Beek EJ, Reid AW, Brown JJ, Yu TC, Flamm SD, Düber C, Judmaier W, Reimer P, Stiskal M, Kramann B, Wolff S, Blankenstein C. Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 17412546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA in decision making for carotid endarterectomy: a 6-year experience. Barth A, Arnold M, Mattle HP, Schroth G, Remonda L. Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006 Dec; 21(5-6):393-400. PubMed ID: 16534196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable? Buerke B, Allkemper T, Kugel H, Bremer C, Evers S, Kooijman H, Heindel W, Tombach B. Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]