These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
158 related items for PubMed ID: 18269465
1. Comparison of prostate and transition zone volume measured by the ellipsoid and planimetric methods with transrectal ultrasonography before seed implantation of prostate cancer. Ikeda T, Shinohara K. Int J Urol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):190-1. PubMed ID: 18269465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography for use in a brachytherapy program. Chenven ES, Glazier DB, Krisch EB, Diamond SM, Marmar JL. Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):752-5. PubMed ID: 11711354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy. MacMahon PJ, Kennedy AM, Murphy DT, Maher M, McNicholas MM. Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of ellipsoid prostate deformation on dose delivery during permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Nakamura R, Ishiyama H, Tanji S, Satoh T, Oikawa H, Inatsu W, Ehara S, Hayakawa K. Brachytherapy; 2011 Jan; 10(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 20685175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Nathan MS, Seenivasagam K, Mei Q, Wickham JE, Miller RA. Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy. Jeong CW, Park HK, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee HJ, Lee SE. Urol Int; 2008 Mar; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. Rodriguez E, Skarecky D, Narula N, Ahlering TE. J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate: in vivo comparison of different methods. Bangma CH, Niemer AQ, Grobbee DE, Schröder FH. Prostate; 1996 Feb; 28(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 8604390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the Ellipsoid Formula the New Standard for 3-Tesla MRI Prostate Volume Calculation without Endorectal Coil? Haas M, Günzel K, Miller K, Hamm B, Cash H, Asbach P. Urol Int; 2017 Feb; 98(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 27627060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transrectal ultrasound based prostate volume determination: is the frustum algorithm more accurate than planimetry? Liu D, Usmani N, Sloboda RS. Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031705. PubMed ID: 23464300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of three calliper-based transrectal ultrasound methods and digital rectal examination in the estimation of prostate volume and its changes with age: the Krimpen study. Bosch JL, Bohnen AM, Groeneveld FP, Bernsen R. Prostate; 2005 Mar 01; 62(4):353-63. PubMed ID: 15389783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of prostatic measuring by transrectal ultrasound in surgical management of patients with clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia. Milonas D, Trumbeckas D, Juska P. Medicina (Kaunas); 2003 Mar 01; 39(9):860-6. PubMed ID: 14515048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of neoadjuvant bicalutamide and dutasteride as a cytoreductive regimen before prostate brachytherapy. Merrick GS, Butler WM, Wallner KE, Galbreath RW, Allen ZA, Kurko B. Urology; 2006 Jul 01; 68(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 16844453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate volume determination: differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS. Kälkner KM, Kubicek G, Nilsson J, Lundell M, Levitt S, Nilsson S. Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov 01; 81(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 17069912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vesicoprostatic echography versus transrectal planimetry in the determination of prostatic volume]. Martínez Jabaloyas JM, Ruiz Cerdá JL, Osca García JM, Sanz Chinesta S, Boronat Tormo F, Jiménez Cruz JF. Actas Urol Esp; 1993 May 01; 17(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 7688177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy. Sajadi KP, Terris MK, Hamilton RJ, Cullen J, Amling CL, Kane CJ, Presti JC, Aronson WJ, Freedland SJ. J Urol; 2007 Sep 01; 178(3 Pt 1):990-5. PubMed ID: 17632170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Errors in transrectal ultrasonic planimetry of the prostate: computer simulation of volumetric errors applied to a screening population. Bangma CH, Hengeveld EJ, Niemer AQ, Schröder FH. Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995 Sep 01; 21(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7754570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of suprapubic and transrectal measurements in assessment of prostate dimensions and volume: is transrectal ultrasonography really necessary for prostate measurements? Ozden E, Göğüş C, Kiliç O, Yaman O, Ozdiler E. Urol J; 2009 Sep 01; 6(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 19711277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of prostatic planimetry using transrectal sonography in prostatic diseases. Watanabe H, Kojima M. Semin Surg Oncol; 1997 Sep 01; 13(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9358589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of transition zone volume by transrectal ultrasound in patients with clinically benign prostatic hyperplasia: agreement with enucleated prostate adenoma weight. Baltaci S, Yagci C, Aksoy H, Elan AH, Gögüs O. J Urol; 2000 Jul 01; 164(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 10841600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]