These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
387 related items for PubMed ID: 18275736
1. Comparison of a novel FiberWire-button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Forsythe K, Freedman KB, Stover MD, Patwardhan AG. Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Jan; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18275736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang LQ, Strohmeyer G, Vora A. Foot Ankle Int; 2010 Jan; 31(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 20067726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison. Soin SP, Knight TA, Dinah AF, Mears SC, Swierstra BA, Belkoff SM. Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Apr; 30(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 19356360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Fibular Motion After Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries With a Screw or Suture-Button Construct. LaMothe JM, Baxter JR, Murphy C, Gilbert S, DeSandis B, Drakos MC. Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1350-1356. PubMed ID: 27654046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model. Lubberts B, Vopat BG, Wolf JC, Longo UG, DiGiovanni CW, Guss D. Injury; 2017 Nov; 48(11):2433-2437. PubMed ID: 28899558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of syndesmotic injury fixation methods using a cadaveric model. Ebramzadeh E, Knutsen AR, Sangiorgio SN, Brambila M, Harris TG. Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Dec; 34(12):1710-7. PubMed ID: 24019217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Teramoto A, Suzuki D, Kamiya T, Chikenji T, Watanabe K, Yamashita T. Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2226-32. PubMed ID: 21768530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-diaphyseal fibular fractures with syndesmotic disruption: should we plate the fibula? Ho JY, Ren Y, Kelikian A, Aminian A, Charnley I, Zhang LQ. Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Jun; 29(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 18549755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel anatomical reconstruction of distal tibiofibular ligaments restores syndesmotic biomechanics. Che J, Li C, Gao Z, Qi W, Ji B, Liu Y, Liow MHL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jun; 25(6):1866-1872. PubMed ID: 28321479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tibiotalar joint dynamics: indications for the syndesmotic screw--a cadaver study. Burns WC, Prakash K, Adelaar R, Beaudoin A, Krause W. Foot Ankle; 1993 Jun; 14(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 8491430 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Zhang P, Liang Y, He J, Fang Y, Chen P, Wang J. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jul 04; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28676078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]