These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1006 related items for PubMed ID: 18276929
41. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction. Hans MG, Kishiyama C, Parker SH, Wolf GR, Noachtar R. Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study. Alkumru P, Erdem D, Altug-Atac AT. Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients. Kim SJ, Kim KH, Yu HS, Baik HS. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of posterior bite-plane on dentoskeletal changes in skeletal open-bite malocclusion. Meibodi SE, Fatahi Meybodi S, Samadi AH. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009 Mar; 27(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 19915269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance. Lau EY, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC, Hughes T. Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The effect of an anterior biteplate on dental and skeletal Class II correction using headgears: a cephalometric study. Thurman MM, King GJ, Ramsay DS, Wheeler TT, Phillips C. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 22008301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report. Felicita AS, Chandrasekar S, Sundari KK. Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances. Chhibber A, Upadhyay M, Shetty VS, Mogra S. Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Lima KJ, Henriques JF, Janson G, Pereira SC, Neves LS, Cançado RH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups. Cha KS. Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I. Cook AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination. Acar AG, Gürsoy S, Dinçer M. Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures. Karaman AI. Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study. Aras A, Cinsar A, Bulut H. Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study. Hu Y, Billiau AD, Verdonck A, Wouters C, Carels C. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]