These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
298 related items for PubMed ID: 18298543
1. Heat-treated glass ionomer cement fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow-up. Skrinjaric K, Vranic DN, Glavina D, Skrinjaric I. Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 18298543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students. Ulusu T, Odabaş ME, Tüzüner T, Baygin O, Sillelioğlu H, Deveci C, Gökdoğan FG, Altuntaş A. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Forss H, Halme E. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study. Gorseta K, Glavina D, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Van Duinen RN, Skrinjaric I, Hill RG, Lynch E. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. Petrauskienė S, Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K, Narbutaitė J. Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May 01; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants. Guler C, Yilmaz Y. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013 May 01; 37(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23855170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial. Cabral RN, Faber J, Otero SAM, Hilgert LA, Leal SC. Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec 01; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial. Baseggio W, Naufel FS, Davidoff DC, Nahsan FP, Flury S, Rodrigues JA. Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010 Dec 01; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of a glass ionomer cement used as a pit and fissure sealant in recently erupted permanent first molars. Barja-Fidalgo F, Maroun S, de Oliveira BH. J Dent Child (Chic); 2009 Dec 01; 76(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19341577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5-year evaluation of two glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. Pardi V, Pereira AC, Mialhe FL, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Oct 01; 31(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 14667010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fuji III vs. Fuji VII glass ionomer sealants--a clinical study. Kamala BK, Hegde AM. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008 Oct 01; 33(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 19093648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants. Oba AA, Dülgergil T, Sönmez IS, Doğan S. J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov 01; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3-year clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. Pereira AC, Pardi V, Mialhe FL, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM. Am J Dent; 2003 Feb 01; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12744408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: review of literature. Yip HK, Smales RJ. Int Dent J; 2002 Apr 01; 52(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 12013252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yıldız E. J Dent; 2014 Feb 01; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the caries-preventive effect of two fissure sealing modalities in public health care: a single application of glass ionomer and a routine resin-based sealant programme. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Kervanto-Seppälä S, Lavonius E, Pietilä I, Pitkäniemi J, Meurman JH, Kerosuo E. Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Jan 01; 18(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18086027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant. Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R. J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb 01; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft-start polymerization of fissure sealant: retention after three years. Glavina D, Vranić DN, Milosević SA, Bergman V, Majstorović M, Skrinjarić I. Coll Antropol; 2007 Dec 01; 31(4):1089-92. PubMed ID: 18217464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb 01; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Remineralization Capacity of Three Fissure Sealants with and without Gaseous Ozone on Non-Cavitated Incipient Pit and Fissure Caries. Unal M, Oztas N. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015 Feb 01; 39(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 26161609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]