These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

374 related items for PubMed ID: 18307214

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Birth-weight prediction by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
    Bennini JR, Marussi EF, Barini R, Faro C, Peralta CF.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 20069666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS, Robischon K, Cox C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
    Kayem G, Grangé G, Bréart G, Goffinet F.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
    Lindell G, Marsál K.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK, Rushworth V, Shah PS, Keunen J, Windrim R, Ryan G, Kingdom J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A prospective pilot study in assessing the accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight prior to delivery.
    Sekar R, Khatun M, Barrett HL, Duncombe G.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb; 56(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 26299881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
    Santolaya-Forgas J, Meyer WJ, Gauthier DW, Kahn D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prediction of macrosomia by serial sonographic measurements of fetal soft-tissues and the liver in women with pregestational diabetes.
    Garabedian C, Vambergue A, Salleron J, Deruelle P.
    Diabetes Metab; 2013 Dec; 39(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23643348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.