These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

808 related items for PubMed ID: 18307902

  • 1. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].
    Li Y, Chen ZJ, Yang HJ, Zhong WX, Ma SY, Li M.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):753-5. PubMed ID: 18307902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
    Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, Gardner DK.
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1976-82. PubMed ID: 18544577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?
    Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 21(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 19276976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.
    Levron J, Leibovitz O, Brengauz M, Gitman H, Yerushalmi GM, Katorza E, Gat I, Elizur SE.
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar; 30(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 24397397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison on in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in KSOM or SOF and cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification.
    Nedambale TL, Dinnyés A, Groen W, Dobrinsky JR, Tian XC, Yang X.
    Theriogenology; 2004 Aug; 62(3-4):437-49. PubMed ID: 15226000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
    Sifer C, Sermondade N, Dupont C, Poncelet C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Hugues JN, Benzacken B, Levy R.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of genotype on the efficiency of mouse embryo cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing methods.
    Dinnyés A, Wallace GA, Rall WF.
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1995 Apr; 40(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 7598908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
    Debrock S, Peeraer K, Fernandez Gallardo E, De Neubourg D, Spiessens C, D'Hooghe TM.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Conventional slow freezing, vitrification and open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification of rabbit embryos.
    Naik BR, Rao BS, Vagdevi R, Gnanprakash M, Amarnath D, Rao VH.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Apr; 86(3-4):329-38. PubMed ID: 15766810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Blastocyst rate and live births from vitrification and slow-cooled two-cell mouse embryos.
    Graves-Herring JE, Boone WR.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):920-4. PubMed ID: 18314119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
    El-Toukhy T, Kamal A, Wharf E, Grace J, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P.
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cryotop vitrification as compared to conventional slow freezing for human embryos at the cleavage stage: survival and outcomes.
    Lin TK, Su JT, Lee FK, Lin YR, Lo HC.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 49(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 21056310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy.
    Van Landuyt L, Stoop D, Verheyen G, Verpoest W, Camus M, Van de Velde H, Devroey P, Van den Abbeel E.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):527-34. PubMed ID: 21212054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (>or=10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma.
    Luna M, Copperman AB, Duke M, Ezcurra D, Sandler B, Barritt J.
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 17531231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Successful pregnancies after oocyte cryopreservation with slow-freezing method: a report of 3 cases.
    Ding J, Rana N, Dmowski WP.
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct; 53(10):813-20. PubMed ID: 19004412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates.
    Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Mar; 24(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 22289155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ultra rapid freezing and vitrification of human embryos derived from abnormally fertilised zygotes.
    Molina I, Duque CC, Alfonso J, Cervera RP, Romeu A.
    Cryo Letters; 2006 Mar; 27(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16691310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of different cryopreservation techniques: higher survival and implantation rate of frozen-thawed mouse pronuclear embryos in the presence of beta-mercaptoethanol in post-thaw culture.
    Bagis H, Akkoc T, Taskin C, Arat S.
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2010 Dec; 45(6):e332-7. PubMed ID: 20074321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.