These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
177 related items for PubMed ID: 18309040
1. Further investigation of findings reported for the Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised. Langton CM, Barbaree HE, Harkins L, Peacock EJ, Arenovich T. J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1363-79. PubMed ID: 18309040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders. Firestone P, Nunes KL, Moulden H, Broom I, Bradford JM. Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15971010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychopathy, treatment change, and recidivism in high-risk, high-need sexual offenders. Looman J, Abracen J, Serin R, Marquis P. J Interpers Violence; 2005 May; 20(5):549-68. PubMed ID: 15788554 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The factor structure of static actuarial items: its relation to prediction. Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ. Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):207-26. PubMed ID: 16937082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and wales. Barnett GD, Wakeling HC, Howard PD. Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):443-70. PubMed ID: 20930189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of measures of risk for recidivism in sexual offenders. Looman J, Abracen J. J Interpers Violence; 2010 May; 25(5):791-807. PubMed ID: 19571251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the likelihood of future sexual recidivism: pilot study findings from a California sex offender risk project and cross-validation of the Static-99. Sreenivasan S, Garrick T, Norris R, Cusworth-Walker S, Weinberger LE, Essres G, Turner S, Fain T. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007 May; 35(4):454-68. PubMed ID: 18086738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Doren DM. J Interpers Violence; 2004 Aug; 19(8):835-56. PubMed ID: 15231025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Construct validity of the Violence Risk Scale--Sexual Offender Version for measuring sexual deviance. Canales DD, Olver ME, Wong SC. Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):474-92. PubMed ID: 19901240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL, Lalumière ML, Boer D, Lang C. Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-, three-, and four-factor PCL-R models in applied sex offender risk assessments. Weaver CM, Meyer RG, Van Nort JJ, Tristan L. Assessment; 2006 Jun; 13(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 16672735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the static-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland. Endrass J, Urbaniok F, Held L, Vetter S, Rossegger A. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 18268078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Female and male sex offenders: a comparison of recidivism patterns and risk factors. Freeman NJ, Sandler JC. J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1394-413. PubMed ID: 18349348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]