These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


560 related items for PubMed ID: 18317397

  • 1. Otologics fully implantable hearing system: Phase I trial 1-year results.
    Jenkins HA, Atkins JS, Horlbeck D, Hoffer ME, Balough B, Alexiades G, Garvis W.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 18317397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. U.S. Phase I preliminary results of use of the Otologics MET Fully-Implantable Ossicular Stimulator.
    Jenkins HA, Atkins JS, Horlbeck D, Hoffer ME, Balough B, Arigo JV, Alexiades G, Garvis W.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 17666242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A pilot study of the safety and performance of the Otologics fully implantable hearing device: transducing sounds via the round window membrane to the inner ear.
    Lefebvre PP, Martin C, Dubreuil C, Decat M, Yazbeck A, Kasic J, Tringali S.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Aug; 14(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 19005251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. European results with totally implantable carina placed on the round window: 2-year follow-up.
    Martin C, Deveze A, Richard C, Lefebvre PP, Decat M, Ibañez LG, Truy E, Mom T, Lavieille JP, Magnan J, Dubreuil C, Tringali S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1196-203. PubMed ID: 19890224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device.
    Briggs RJ, Eder HC, Seligman PM, Cowan RS, Plant KL, Dalton J, Money DK, Patrick JF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 17898671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR, Gnadeberg D, Ambjørnsen K, Mack KF, Winter M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
    Verhaegen VJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K, Pok SM, Schloegel M, Filzmoser P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Long-term assessment after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge device.
    Schmuziger N, Schimmann F, àWengen D, Patscheke J, Probst R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 16436987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Phase 1 clinical trial results of the Envoy System: a totally implantable middle ear device for sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chen DA, Backous DD, Arriaga MA, Garvin R, Kobylek D, Littman T, Walgren S, Lura D.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Dec; 131(6):904-16. PubMed ID: 15577788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, Morgon AH, Müller-Deile J, Ramos Macias A.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV, Dyer RK, Matthews P, Wood MW.
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users.
    Jenkins HA, Uhler K.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22158017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intraoperative ossicular loading with the Otologics fully implantable hearing device.
    Jenkins HA, Pergola N, Kasic J.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 17453454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Häusler R, Stieger C, Bernhard H, Kompis M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Jun; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.