These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
868 related items for PubMed ID: 18319095
1. The further development and validation of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ) version 3: a cross-sectional survey of patients referred to a dental hospital for removable prostheses replacement. Pace-Balzan A, Butterworth CJ, Dawson LJ, Lowe D, Rogers SN. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 18319095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The further development and validation of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a cross-sectional survey of patients attending for oral rehabilitation and general dental practice. Pace-Balzan A, Cawood JI, Howell R, Butterworth CJ, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 16188426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ellis JS, Pelekis ND, Thomason JM. J Prosthodont; 2007 Jan; 16(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17244306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. John MT, Slade GD, Szentpétery A, Setz JM. Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Jan; 17(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 15543905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Self-perceived changes in oral health-related quality of life after receiving different types of conventional prosthetic treatments: a cohort follow-up study. Montero J, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Lynch CD, Albaladejo A, Castaño A. J Dent; 2013 Jun; 41(6):493-503. PubMed ID: 23353070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers. Preciado A, Del Río J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyagüe R. J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 23831418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of removable partial dentures on oral health-related quality of life in subjects with shortened dental arches: a 2-center cross-sectional study. Armellini DB, Heydecke G, Witter DJ, Creugers NH. Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Sep; 21(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 19149071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-reported problems before and after prosthodontic treatments according to newly created Turkish version of oral health impact profile. Baran I, Nalcaci R. Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2011 Sep; 53(2):e99-105. PubMed ID: 20705349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of removable dentures on oral health-related quality of life among elderly adults in Taiwan. Yen YY, Lee HE, Wu YM, Lan SJ, Wang WC, Du JK, Huang ST, Hsu KJ. BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jan 05; 15():1. PubMed ID: 25559722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of tooth loss in a denture wearing population: an assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile. Allen PF, McMillan AS. Community Dent Health; 1999 Sep 05; 16(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 10641078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Denture quality has a minimal effect on health-related quality of life in patients with removable dentures. Inoue M, John MT, Tsukasaki H, Furuyama C, Baba K. J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Nov 05; 38(11):818-26. PubMed ID: 21517932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The responsiveness of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ): a pilot study. Pace-Balzan A, Butterworth C, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Nov 05; 22(5):456-8. PubMed ID: 20095193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study. Pace-Balzan A, Cawood JI, Howell R, Lowe D, Rogers SN. J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun 05; 31(6):609-17. PubMed ID: 15189321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effects of removable partial dentures on the quality of life in people with shortened dental arches]. Armellini DB, Heydecke G, Witter DJ, Creugers NH. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 Dec 05; 116(12):687-93. PubMed ID: 20101937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral health impact in patients wearing removable prostheses: relations to somatization, pain sensitivity, and body consciousness. Klages U, Esch M, Wehrbein H. Int J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec 05; 18(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 15889657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Yamaga E, Minakuchi S. Gerodontology; 2012 Jun 05; 29(2):e1033-7. PubMed ID: 22187955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the psychometric characteristics of the Macedonian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-MAC49). Kenig N, Nikolovska J. Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Mar 05; 11(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22488030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A study to compare the oral health impact profile and satisfaction before and after having replacement complete dentures constructed by either the copy or the conventional technique. Scott BJ, Forgie AH, Davis DM. Gerodontology; 2006 Jun 05; 23(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 16677180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of oral health-related quality of life assessment in prosthodontic patients using abbreviated Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaires. Baba K, Inukai M, John MT. J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Mar 05; 35(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 18254801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ) into the Dutch language. Engelen M, Buurman DJM, Bronkhorst EM, van Heumen CCM. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb 05; 119(2):239-243. PubMed ID: 28552282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]