These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

146 related items for PubMed ID: 18323279

  • 1. Comparison of cytohistologic techniques in diagnosis of gastroesophageal malignancy.
    Batra M, Handa U, Mohan H, Sachdev A.
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18323279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Crush preparations of gastroesophageal biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of malignancy.
    Kochhar R, Bhasin DK, Rajwanshi A, Gupta SK, Malik AK, Mehta SK.
    Acta Cytol; 1990; 34(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 2181803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prospective comparison of the value of brushings before and after biopsy in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroesophageal malignancy.
    Zargar SA, Khuroo MS, Jan GM, Mahajan R, Shah P.
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(5):549-52. PubMed ID: 1927197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Endoscopic suction cytology in upper gastrointestinal tract malignancy.
    Bhasin DK, Kochhar R, Rajwanshi A, Gupta SK, Mehta SK.
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(4):452-4. PubMed ID: 2456652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The role of brushing cytology in the diagnosis of gastric malignancy.
    Cook IJ, de Carle DJ, Haneman B, Hunt DR, Talley NA, Miller D.
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 3041720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The use of gastric salvage cytology in the diagnosis of malignancy: a review of 731 cases.
    Green LK, Zachariah S, Graham DY.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1990; 6(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 2323290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of endoscopic brush and biopsy touch smear cytology and biopsy histology in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the lower oesophagus and cardia.
    Young JA, Hughes HE, Lee FD.
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Sep; 33(9):811-4. PubMed ID: 7000841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Exfoliative cytodiagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Comparison with biopsy and endoscopy.
    Moreno-Otero R, Martinez-Raposo A, Cantero J, Pajares JM.
    Acta Cytol; 1983 Sep; 27(5):485-8. PubMed ID: 6578645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A comparison.
    Malhotra V, Puri R, Chinna RS, Chawla LS, Sabharwal BD.
    Acta Cytol; 1996 Sep; 40(5):929-32. PubMed ID: 8842168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Prospective study of digestive tumor detection by endoscopy: a comparison of brush cytology and histology].
    Bron B, Massih L, Brahime G, Obradovic D, Widgren S.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1979 Apr 21; 109(16):610-2. PubMed ID: 432592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnosis of upper gastro-intestinal lesions by endoscopy, cytology and biopsy.
    Leiman G, Tim LO, Segal I.
    S Afr Med J; 1979 Apr 14; 55(16):619-23. PubMed ID: 462273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.