These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 18325174

  • 1. The development of a system for the reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the clinical biochemistry laboratory.
    O'Kane MJ, Lynch PL, McGowan N.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2008 Mar; 45(Pt 2):129-34. PubMed ID: 18325174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The reporting, classification and grading of quality failures in the medical laboratory.
    O'Kane M.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19302996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.
    Cavagna E, Berletti R, Schiavon F, Scarsi B, Barbato G.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development and operation of a quality assurance system for deviations from standard operating procedures in a clinical cell therapy laboratory.
    McKenna D, Kadidlo D, Sumstad D, McCullough J.
    Cytotherapy; 2003 Mar; 5(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12944238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A Six Sigma approach to the rate and clinical effect of registration errors in a laboratory.
    Vanker N, van Wyk J, Zemlin AE, Erasmus RT.
    J Clin Pathol; 2010 May; 63(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 20299386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Identification of patient information corruption in the intensive care unit: using a scoring tool to direct quality improvements in handover.
    Pickering BW, Hurley K, Marsh B.
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Nov; 37(11):2905-12. PubMed ID: 19770735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improving the quality of adverse drug reaction reporting by 4th-year medical students.
    Rosebraugh CJ, Tsong Y, Zhou F, Chen M, Mackey AC, Flowers C, Toyer D, Flockhart DA, Honig PK.
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2003 Mar; 12(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 12642973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD, Mazzachi BC, Watkinson L, Shephard AK, Laurence C, Gialamas A, Bubner T.
    Rural Remote Health; 2009 Mar; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laboratory error undetectable by customary quality control/quality assurance monitors.
    Kazmierczak SC, Catrou PG.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jul; 117(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 8323436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Incident reporting practices in the preanalytical phase: Low reported frequencies in the primary health care setting.
    Söderberg J, Grankvist K, Brulin C, Wallin O.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2009 Jul; 69(7):731-5. PubMed ID: 19929714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A review of the quality of gastrointestinal investigations performed in UK laboratories.
    Duncan A, Hill PG.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2007 Mar; 44(Pt 2):145-58. PubMed ID: 17362580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Governance of preanalytical variability: travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon?
    Lippi G.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19302993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine.
    Plebani M.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2010 Mar; 47(Pt 2):101-10. PubMed ID: 19952034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Quality assessment for preanalytical phase in clinical laboratory: a multicentric study].
    Salinas M, López-Garrigós M, Yago M, Ortuño M, Carratala A, Aguado C, Díaz J, Rodriguez-Borja E, Chinchilla V, Esteban A, Laíz B, Lorente MÁ, Uris J.
    Rev Calid Asist; 2011 Mar; 26(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 21621440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Audit of internal quality control practice and processes in the south-east of England and suggested regional standards.
    Housley D, Kearney E, English E, Smith N, Teal T, Mazurkiewicz J, Freedman DB.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2008 Mar; 45(Pt 2):135-9. PubMed ID: 18325175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quality of reporting of regional anesthesia outcomes in the literature.
    Stojadinovic A, Shockey SM, Croll SM, Buckenmaier CC.
    Pain Med; 2009 Sep; 10(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19671083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Improving the quality of abstract reporting for phase I cancer trials.
    Strevel EL, Chau NG, Pond GR, Murgo AJ, Ivy PS, Siu LL.
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar 15; 14(6):1782-7. PubMed ID: 18347180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R.
    Acta Med Port; 2008 Mar 15; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Preanalytical error occurrence rate in clinical chemistry laboratory of a public hospital in India.
    Singla P, Parkash AA, Bhattacharjee J.
    Clin Lab; 2011 Mar 15; 57(9-10):749-52. PubMed ID: 22029191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The frequency and potential clinical impact of non-analytical errors in the RCPA Microbiology QAP 1987-2008.
    Morris AJ, Haremza E, Walker DA.
    Pathology; 2011 Jun 15; 43(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 21519289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.