These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

543 related items for PubMed ID: 18326712

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies.
    Danesh-Meyer HV, Carroll SC, Gaskin BJ, Gao A, Gamble GD.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1458-63. PubMed ID: 16565379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field sensitivity as measured by optical coherence tomography in chiasmal compression.
    Danesh-Meyer HV, Carroll SC, Foroozan R, Savino PJ, Fan J, Jiang Y, Vander Hoorn S.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4827-35. PubMed ID: 17065494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb 21; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C, Takada S, Okuyama S, Arimura E, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr 21; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
    Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Felletti M.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun 21; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May 21; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug 21; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.