These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

536 related items for PubMed ID: 18328050

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S, Mejàre I.
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M, Mulki E, Roldan R, Arevalo O, Roberts JF, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.
    Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec 31; 2015(12):CD005512. PubMed ID: 26718872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec 31; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns.
    Sonmez D, Duruturk L.
    Br Dent J; 2010 May 08; 208(9):E18; discussion 408-9. PubMed ID: 20448584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb 08; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the treatment outcomes of the conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the hall technique in the treatment of carious primary molars.
    Ayedun OS, Oredugba FA, Sote EO.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Apr 08; 24(4):584-594. PubMed ID: 33851682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M.
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul 08; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of three-dimensional printed resin crowns and preformed stainless steel crowns for primary molar restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lee KE, Kang HS, Shin SY, Lee T, Lee HS, Song JS.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May 08; 48(3):59-67. PubMed ID: 38755983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.