These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

628 related items for PubMed ID: 18328674

  • 1. Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods.
    Galani I, Kontopidou F, Souli M, Rekatsina PD, Koratzanis E, Deliolanis J, Giamarellou H.
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 May; 31(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 18328674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of E-test and disc diffusion methods for the in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of colistin in multi-drug resistant Gram-negative Bacilli.
    Somily AM.
    Saudi Med J; 2010 May; 31(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 20464039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of three standardized disc susceptibility testing methods for colistin.
    Tan TY, Ng LS.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Oct; 58(4):864-7. PubMed ID: 16905528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Sensitivity to colistin: evaluation of cut-off points available in disk diffusion test].
    Rodríguez CH, Pautaso J, Bombicino K, Vay C, Famiglietti A.
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 36(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 15559194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for tigecycline and colistin against Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates, including multidrug-resistant isolates.
    Piewngam P, Kiratisin P.
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Nov; 44(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 25442358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains.
    Lo-Ten-Foe JR, de Smet AM, Diederen BM, Kluytmans JA, van Keulen PH.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-non-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.
    Casal M, Rodríguez F, Johnson B, Garduno E, Tubau F, de Lejarazu RO, Tenorio A, Giménez MJ, Bartolomé R, Garcia-Rey C, Aguilar L, García-Escribano N.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jul; 64(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 19451133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins.
    van der Heijden IM, Levin AS, De Pedri EH, Fung L, Rossi F, Duboc G, Barone AA, Costa SF.
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2007 Aug 15; 6():8. PubMed ID: 17697363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pitfalls of polymyxin antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients.
    Hogardt M, Schmoldt S, Götzfried M, Adler K, Heesemann J.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Dec 15; 54(6):1057-61. PubMed ID: 15509615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 7).
    Andrews JM, BSAC Working Party on Susceptibility Testing.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Aug 15; 62(2):256-78. PubMed ID: 18474513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contemporary assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control guidelines.
    Gales AC, Reis AO, Jones RN.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan 15; 39(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 11136768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin.
    Behera B, Mathur P, Das A, Kapil A, Gupta B, Bhoi S, Farooque K, Sharma V, Misra MC.
    Int J Infect Dis; 2010 Jul 15; 14(7):e596-601. PubMed ID: 20045367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Antimicrobial susceptibility of tigecycline and comparators against bacterial isolates collected as part of the TEST study in Europe (2004-2007).
    Nørskov-Lauritsen N, Marchandin H, Dowzicky MJ.
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2009 Aug 15; 34(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 19342205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Comparison between agar dilution and three other methods for determining the susceptibility of 228 clinical isolates of non-fermenting gram-negative rods].
    Gómez-Garcés JL, Aracil B, Gil Y.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2009 Jun 15; 27(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 19406523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial gram-negative pathogens from 15 teaching hospitals in China in 2005].
    Yang QW, Xu YC, Chen MJ, Hu YJ, Ni YX, Sun JY, Yu YS, Kong HS, He L, Wu WY, Ye HF, Yang YM, Zhu LN, Guo SH, Ji P, Zhu ZH, Ren JK, Zhang LX, Sun ZY, Zhu XH, Tong MQ, Zhao WS, Mei YN, Liu Y, Zhang ZJ, Duan Q, Li D, Liu PP, Wang J, Han LX, Wang H, Xie XL.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct 23; 87(39):2753-8. PubMed ID: 18167265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.