These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results. Demirci M, Uysal O. Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results. Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M. Oper Dent; 2002 Dec; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in Class III cavities: 5-year results. Demirci M, Ersev H, Sancakli HS, Topçubaşi M. Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 17073207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth. Turgut MD, Tekçiçek M, Olmez S. Oper Dent; 2004 Oct; 29(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 15470873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in class I cavities: 5-year results. Demircia M. J Adhes Dent; 2007 Dec; 9(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18265712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E. Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years. Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R. Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up. Pollington S, van Noort R. Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. van Dijken JW. Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities. Demirci M, Sancakli HS. Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive system with three restorative materials in children: six-month results. Baghdadi ZD. Gen Dent; 2005 Feb; 53(5):357-65; quiz 366-8. PubMed ID: 16252540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results. Demirci M, Ersev H, Topçubaşi M, Uçok M. Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]