These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings. Mueller CK, Thorwarth M, Schmidt M, Schlegel KA, Schultze-Mosgau S. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):726-36. PubMed ID: 21441047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone-derived cells. Knabe C, Howlett CR, Klar F, Zreiqat H. J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Oct 01; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15368259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug 01; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone formation on apatite-coated titanium incorporated with bone morphogenetic protein and heparin. Kodama T, Goto T, Miyazaki T, Takahashi T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Aug 01; 23(6):1013-9. PubMed ID: 19216269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec 01; 16(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 16307571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Dec 01; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics. Lumbikanonda N, Sammons R. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Dec 01; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical properties of jaw periosteum-derived mineralized culture on different titanium topography. Att W, Kubo K, Yamada M, Maeda H, Ogawa T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Dec 01; 24(5):831-41. PubMed ID: 19865623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Roesseler S, Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Dec 01; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Plasma mediated collagen-I-coating of metal implant materials to improve biocompatibility. Hauser J, Koeller M, Bensch S, Halfmann H, Awakowicz P, Steinau HU, Esenwein S. J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jul 01; 94(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 20091709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonvolatile buffer coating of titanium to prevent its biological aging and for drug delivery. Suzuki T, Kubo K, Hori N, Yamada M, Kojima N, Sugita Y, Maeda H, Ogawa T. Biomaterials; 2010 Jun 01; 31(18):4818-28. PubMed ID: 20350765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of dental implant surfaces on the expression of bone sialoprotein in cells derived from human mandibular bone. Hilbig H, Wiener T, Armbruster FP, Bekele A, Kirsten M, Graf HL. Med Sci Monit; 2005 Apr 01; 11(4):BR111-5. PubMed ID: 15795688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]