These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 18345844

  • 1. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.
    Allen K, Carlile S, Alais D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech.
    Wu X, Wang C, Chen J, Qu H, Li W, Wu Y, Schneider BA, Li L.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS, Chang PS, Simpson BD, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention.
    Allen K, Alais D, Carlile S.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 19304606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2998-10. PubMed ID: 21110595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Target identification using relative level in multi-talker listening.
    Kitterick PT, Clarke E, O'Shea C, Seymour J, Summerfield AQ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2899-909. PubMed ID: 23654395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X, Yang Z, Huang Y, Chen J, Li L, Daneman M, Schneider BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Measuring Mandarin Speech Recognition Thresholds Using the Method of Adaptive Tracking.
    Wang Y, Lu Z, Yang X, Liu C.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun 19; 62(6):2009-2017. PubMed ID: 31112665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.
    Carlile S, Corkhill C.
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar 02; 5():8662. PubMed ID: 25727100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y, Huang Q, Chen X, Qu T, Wu X, Li L.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct 02; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T, Neher T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan 02; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan 02; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
    Balakrishnan U, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May 02; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep 02; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D, Jourdes V, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2008 May 02; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.