These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 18345844

  • 21. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
    MacCutcheon D, Pausch F, Füllgrabe C, Eccles R, van der Linde J, Panebianco C, Fels J, Ljung R.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct 25; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug 25; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T, Lavandier M, Deroche MLD.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul 25; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD, Ericson MA, Scott KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov 25; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
    Rajan R, Cainer KE.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 23; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J, Wang X, Wang NY, Fu X, Gan T, Galvin JJ, Willis S, Xu K, Thomas M, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug 10; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Masking effects of speech and music: does the masker's hierarchical structure matter?
    Shi LF, Law Y.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr 10; 49(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 20151877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May 10; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation.
    Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug 10; 124(2):1294-305. PubMed ID: 18681615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, Roverud E, Swaminathan J, Jennings T, Clayton K, Steven Colburn H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan 10; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb 10; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder.
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May 10; 19(5):377-91. PubMed ID: 19253811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.
    Allen K, Alais D, Shinn-Cunningham B, Carlile S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct 10; 130(4):2043-53. PubMed ID: 21973359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Drullman R, Bronkhorst AW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov 10; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J, Arehart KH.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr 10; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer.
    Lavandier M, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep 10; 122(3):1713. PubMed ID: 17927431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.