These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
289 related items for PubMed ID: 1834940
1. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G. N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec 19; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists. Turnipseed SD, Bair AE, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Tabar P, Amsterdam EA. Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep 19; 13(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 16885399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Specificity of electrocardiographic myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Shah BR, Lin C, Maynard C, Bart B, Selvester RH, Shaw LK, O'Connor C, Wagner GS. Am Heart J; 1998 Aug 19; 136(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 9704696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation. Schijvenaars BJ, Kors JA, van Herpen G, van Bemmel JH. Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001 Aug 19; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. Anh D, Krishnan S, Bogun F. J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul 19; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram. Bourdillon PJ, Kilpatrick D. Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov 19; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)]. Mengden HJ, Just H, Kaspar W, Löllgen H, Kersting F. Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct 19; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction. Zehender M, Kasper W, Kauder E, Schönthaler M, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H. N Engl J Med; 1993 Apr 08; 328(14):981-8. PubMed ID: 8450875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation. Guglin ME, Thatai D. Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan 13; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists. Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, Brohet CR, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G, Machado H, Michaelis J. Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep 13; 29(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 2233377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?]. Morisbak B, Gjesdal K. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep 30; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic interpretation of electrocardiograms in population-based research: computer program research physicians, or cardiologists? de Bruyne MC, Kors JA, Hoes AW, Kruijssen DA, Deckers JW, Grosfeld M, van Herpen G, Grobbee DE, van Bemmel JH. J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Aug 30; 50(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 9291880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms. Sekiguchi K, Kanda T, Osada M, Tsunoda Y, Kodajima N, Fukumura Y, Suzuki T, Kobayashi I. J Med; 1999 Aug 30; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic ECG classification based on neural networks. Bortolan G, Willems JL. J Electrocardiol; 1993 Aug 30; 26 Suppl():75-9. PubMed ID: 8189152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Where do derived precordial leads fail? Gregg RE, Zhou SH, Lindauer JM, Feild DQ, Helfenbein ED. J Electrocardiol; 2008 Aug 30; 41(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18817921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of cardiologists' decisions to initiate reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with electrocardiograms viewed on liquid crystal displays of cellular telephones. Leibrandt PN, Bell SJ, Savona MR, Pettis KS, Selvester RH, Maynard C, Warner R, Wagner GS. Am Heart J; 2000 Nov 30; 140(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 11054620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver agreement in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. Sokolove PE, Sgarbossa EB, Amsterdam EA, Gelber R, Lee TC, Maynard C, Richards JR, Valente R, Wagner GS. Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec 30; 36(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 11097696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of the automated analysis of the electrocardiogram by the Telemed program (V version)]. Bernard P, Chaitman BR, Scholl JM, Chabot M. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Oct 30; 74(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 6796019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs versus cardiologists' triage decision making based on teletransmitted data in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Clark EN, Sejersten M, Clemmensen P, Macfarlane PW. Am J Cardiol; 2010 Dec 15; 106(12):1696-702. PubMed ID: 21126612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]