These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

276 related items for PubMed ID: 1835107

  • 21. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Bruè C, Piccolomini R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 2148943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Hörsted-Bindslev P, Knudsen J, Baelum V.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9002810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system--results at three years.
    Tyas MJ, Burrow MF.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Feb; 26(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11203771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
    Shortall AC.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM, Jenson ME, Doering JV, Sheth JJ.
    Gen Dent; 1989 Feb; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE, Mjor IA.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M, Nakata M.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994 Feb; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Feb; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of the bond between composite resin and etched glass ionomer cement.
    Tyas MJ, Toohey A, Clark J.
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Feb; 34(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 2523216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations.
    Osborne JW, Berry TG.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 2150170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Marginal leakage around V-shaped cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
    Zyskind D, Frenkel A, Fuks A, Hirschfeld Z.
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 1838417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Oct; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni SH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Oct; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.