These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1110 related items for PubMed ID: 18355517

  • 1. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement.
    Nozohoor S, Nilsson J, Lührs C, Roijer A, Sjögren J.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1310-7. PubMed ID: 18355517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.
    Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Bédard P, Hendry PJ, Lam BK, Burwash IG, Goldstein WG, Brais MP, Keon WJ, Mesana TG.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 14752425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
    Frapier JM, Rouvière P, Razcka F, Aymard T, Albat B, Chaptal PA.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression.
    Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1036-44. PubMed ID: 16678587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly.
    Roscitano A, Benedetto U, Sciangula A, Merico E, Barberi F, Bianchini R, Tonelli E, Sinatra R.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Kato Y, Suehiro S, Shibata T, Sasaki Y, Hirai H.
    J Card Surg; 2007 Feb; 22(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 17661773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life.
    Ennker J, Rosendahl U, Albert A, Dumlu E, Ennker IC, Florath I.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 16116880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
    Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A, Bleiziffer S, Badiu CC, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R, Eichinger WB.
    Circulation; 2009 Sep 15; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on exercise-induced arrhythmias: a further aspect after aortic valve replacement.
    Mannacio VA, De Amicis V, Di Tommaso L, Iorio F, Vosa C.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Sep 15; 138(3):632-8. PubMed ID: 19698849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years' experience in 130 patients.
    D'Onofrio A, Auriemma S, Magagna P, Favaro A, Cannarella A, Piccin C, Bilotta M, Abbiate N, Lamascese N, Fabbri A.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Aug 15; 134(2):491-5. PubMed ID: 17662795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS, Goldman B, Verrier E, Petracek M, Wood J, Goldman S, David T, Toronto SPV Valve Study Group.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar 15; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Early hemodynamic results of the Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic bioprostheses.
    Cattaneo P, Bruno VD, Mariscalco G, Marchetti P, Ferrarese S, Salerno-Uriarte J, Sala A.
    J Card Surg; 2007 Mar 15; 22(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 17803572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size.
    Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Stassano P, Vosa C.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May 15; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
    Botzenhardt F, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, Guenzinger R, Wagner IM, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun 21; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.