These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 1836459

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.
    Vollmer TR, Iwata BA.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 1890048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Reducing indices of unhappiness among individuals with profound multiple disabilities during therapeutic exercise routines.
    Green CW, Reid DH.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):137-46; quiz 146-7. PubMed ID: 10396767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.
    Wacker DP, Berg WK, Wiggins B, Muldoon M, Cavanaugh J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1985; 18(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 4019352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting.
    Northup J, Wacker D, Sasso G, Steege M, Cigrand K, Cook J, DeRaad A.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(3):509-22. PubMed ID: 1752840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
    Fischer SM, Iwata BA, Mazaleski JL.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9210304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    Piazza CC, Fisher WW, Hagopian LP, Bowman LG, Toole L.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
    Hagopian LP, Rush KS, Lewin AB, Long ES.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.
    Kelly MA, Roscoe EM, Hanley GP, Schlichenmeyer K.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 24604393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
    Pace GM, Ivancic MT, Edwards GL, Iwata BA, Page TJ.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1985; 18(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 4044458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
    Kodak T, Fisher WW, Kelley ME, Kisamore A.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 19327964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.