These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

588 related items for PubMed ID: 18380426

  • 21. WinDock: structure-based drug discovery on Windows-based PCs.
    Hu Z, Southerland W.
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Nov 15; 28(14):2347-51. PubMed ID: 17476686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Recent trends in library design: 'rational design' revisited.
    Schnur DM.
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May 15; 11(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 18428091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Concept of combinatorial de novo design of drug-like molecules by particle swarm optimization.
    Hartenfeller M, Proschak E, Schüller A, Schneider G.
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jul 15; 72(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18564216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. CLEVER: pipeline for designing in silico chemical libraries.
    Song CM, Bernardo PH, Chai CL, Tong JC.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan 15; 27(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 18986817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. PGVL Hub: An integrated desktop tool for medicinal chemists to streamline design and synthesis of chemical libraries and singleton compounds.
    Peng Z, Yang B, Mattaparti S, Shulok T, Thacher T, Kong J, Kostrowicki J, Hu Q, Na J, Zhou JZ, Klatte D, Chao B, Ito S, Clark J, Sciammetta N, Coner B, Waller C, Kuki A.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011 Jan 15; 685():295-320. PubMed ID: 20981530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Molecular library design using multi-objective optimization methods.
    Nicolaou CA, Kannas CC.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011 Jan 15; 685():53-69. PubMed ID: 20981518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A review of high throughput technology for the screening of natural products.
    Mishra KP, Ganju L, Sairam M, Banerjee PK, Sawhney RC.
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2008 Feb 15; 62(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 17692498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Automated recycling of chemistry for virtual screening and library design.
    Vainio MJ, Kogej T, Raubacher F.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jul 23; 52(7):1777-86. PubMed ID: 22657574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Combinatorial library design from reagent pharmacophore fingerprints.
    Chen H, Engkvist O, Blomberg N.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011 Jul 23; 685():135-52. PubMed ID: 20981522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Assessing the scaffold diversity of screening libraries.
    Krier M, Bret G, Rognan D.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Jul 23; 46(2):512-24. PubMed ID: 16562979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.