These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

633 related items for PubMed ID: 18384971

  • 1. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct 12; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A, Sly D, Cowan R, van Hoesel R.
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug 12; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug 12; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C, Kaider A, Hamzavi J.
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct 12; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul 12; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A, Psarros C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun 12; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct 12; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The auditory midbrain implant: a new auditory prosthesis for neural deafness-concept and device description.
    Lenarz T, Lim HH, Reuter G, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep 12; 27(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 16936570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Inferior colliculus responses to multichannel microstimulation of the ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for auditory brain stem implants.
    Shivdasani MN, Mauger SJ, Rathbone GD, Paolini AG.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan 12; 99(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 17928560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
    Otto SR, Shannon RV, Wilkinson EP, Hitselberger WE, McCreery DB, Moore JK, Brackmann DE.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec 12; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].
    Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Laszig R.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug 12; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul 12; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr 12; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Brain stem responses evoked by stimulation of the mature cochlear nucleus with an auditory brain stem implant.
    O'Driscoll M, El-Deredy W, Ramsden RT.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr 12; 32(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 21157353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.
    Botros A, Psarros C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun 12; 31(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20124902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Responses of neurons in the feline inferior colliculus to modulated electrical stimuli applied on and within the ventral cochlear nucleus; Implications for an advanced auditory brainstem implant.
    McCreery D, Yadev K, Han M.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun 12; 363():85-97. PubMed ID: 29573880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Jun 12; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Kirby AE, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb 12; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 21969022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.
    Frijns JH, Kalkman RK, Vanpoucke FJ, Bongers JS, Briaire JJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr 12; 129(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 19117170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.