These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 1838771

  • 1. Fracture resistance of pin-retained amalgam, composite resin, and alloy-reinforced glass ionomer core materials.
    Kao EC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 1838771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC, Hart S, Johnston WM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989 Oct; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins.
    Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 1403855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins.
    Sen D, Nayir E, Cetiner F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 87(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 12011862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Parapulpal pins and their effects on the fracture resistance of pin-retained cores.
    Haller B, Götze W, Weiss G.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Sep; 18(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 1800696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fracture durability of restored functional cusps on maxillary nonvital premolar teeth.
    Ulusoy N, Nayyar A, Morris CF, Fairhurst CW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 1800729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features.
    Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Lee JK.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 8511280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S, Rasimick BJ, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Mar; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology.
    Dhanasomboon S, Nikaido T, Shimada Y, Tagami J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro shear strength of bonded amalgam cores with and without pins.
    Lo CS, Millstein PL, Nathanson D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 8531157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.