These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 1838771

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Resistance of composite and amalgam core foundations retained with and without pins and bonding agents.
    Imbery TA, Swigert R, Richman B, Sawicki V, Pace L, Moon PC.
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):130-7; quiz 138-9. PubMed ID: 20236921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Fracture toughness of various core build-up materials.
    Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA.
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 11074023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ, Santana FR, Pereira JC, Araujo TS, Menezes MS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin.
    Brackett WW, Bailey JH.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Jun; 17(4):152-5. PubMed ID: 1287596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
    Boyer DB, Roth L.
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam.
    Blum IR, Hafiana K, Curtis A, Barbour ME, Attin T, Lynch CD, Jagger DC.
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 22100436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M, Schoonbeek G, Gökçe B, Cömlekoglu E, Dündar M.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jan; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI, Volovich Y, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS.
    Gen Dent; 2001 Nov; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.