These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

584 related items for PubMed ID: 18388667

  • 1. Multisite Web-based training in using the Braden Scale to predict pressure sore risk.
    Magnan MA, Maklebust J.
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Mar; 21(3):124-33. PubMed ID: 18388667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computer-based testing of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
    Maklebust J, Sieggreen MY, Sidor D, Gerlach MA, Bauer C, Anderson C.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Apr; 51(4):40-2, 44, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 16089059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments.
    Magnan MA, Maklebust J.
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008 Apr; 35(2):199-208; discussion 209-12. PubMed ID: 18344795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A quasi-experimental study to assess the effect of technology-assisted training on correct endorsement of pressure ulcer preventive interventions.
    Maklebust J, Magnan MA.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):32-42. PubMed ID: 19246783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability of Braden subscale ratings.
    Magnan MA, Maklebust J.
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009 Feb; 36(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 19096357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J, Dassen T.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E, Pang S, Wong T, Ho J, Shao-ling X, Li-jun T.
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D, Goldstone L, Kelly D, Gammon J.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J, Halfens R, Dassen T.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J, Dassen T.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Risk assessment and risk-based programs of prevention in various settings.
    Braden BJ, Bergstrom N.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1996 Oct; 42(10A Suppl):6S-12S. PubMed ID: 9397878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Braden Scale risk assessments and pressure ulcer prevention planning: what's the connection?
    Magnan MA, Maklebust J.
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009 Oct; 36(6):622-34. PubMed ID: 19920743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. How to try this: predicting pressure ulcer risk. Using the Braden scale with hospitalized older adults: the evidence supports it.
    Stotts NA, Gunningberg L.
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Nov; 107(11):40-8; quiz 48-9. PubMed ID: 18075340
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes.
    Hiser B, Rochette J, Philbin S, Lowerhouse N, Terburgh C, Pietsch C.
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):48-59. PubMed ID: 16464994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of a web-based course for community nurses on postpartum emotional distress.
    Ingadóttir E, Thome M.
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2006 Mar; 20(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16489964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of specific educational preparation on emergency nurses' clinical decisions regarding supplemental oxygen administration.
    Considine J, Botti M, Thomas S.
    Nurs Health Sci; 2006 Jun; 8(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 16764558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.
    Defloor T, Grypdonck MF.
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Mar; 14(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 15707448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
    Vanderwee K, Grypdonck MH, De Bacquer D, Defloor T.
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 19(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 16877195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Wound wise: PUPPI: the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Protocol Interventions.
    Catania K, Huang C, James P, Madison M, Moran M, Ohr M.
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Apr; 107(4):44-52; quiz 53. PubMed ID: 17413732
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Automating pressure ulcer risk assessment using documented patient data.
    Kim H, Choi J, Thompson S, Meeker L, Dykes P, Goldsmith D, Ohno-Machado L.
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Dec; 79(12):840-8. PubMed ID: 20869303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.